Drafts of Digipaks
Before making
the digipak, drafting had to be done as we needed to make sure the digipak
looked conventional to what you would expect from a music album. Each time we made
a new draft, we asked people who liked the UK rap genre for feedback because
we knew their feedback would be helpful. Also, during this process we looked at
existing products online to help strengthen our ideas.
Draft 1:
Positives:
-colour scheme is very good
-clear consistency and style
-good images provided and used
Typography is good and suits the style
Improvements:
-Def Jam goes
on the back
-production
company details missing
-Inside panel
is not white
-CD looks a bit boring
Draft 2:
Positives:
-front and back complement each other very well
-good artistic style and theme to the product
Improvements:
-inside image
does need to be circular, distracts from the CD panel
-lyrics are
blurred and looks odd
-think about
what else you could put in the inside panel
Draft 3:
Positives:
-really good consistency across all panels
-layout and artist image is conventional to the genre
Improvements:
-album name
on front?
-some green
noticeable on MD’s face on the front
-instead of “Ying
X Yang” on the inside, can you think of other words to use?
Conclusion:
It is quite clear
that over the drafts that Josh and I created, our work got better and more
conventional/professional looking. Like all the drafting we have done, this
process has allowed us to make a product that we know will hopefully appeal to
our audience and reflect our genre. I will take into consideration the feedback
received in draft 3 to ensure that the final product is a desirable one.
Excellent evidence to show that drafting has taken place within your group to create the digipak product.
ReplyDelete